OK, let's put the #lodestar #NYTimesOpEd in perspective. We're told by the national media that dozens of senior aides and staffers are part of this WH insurrection. Yet, NOT ONE INDIVIDUAL has had the courage/integrity to resign and speak out.
— Peter Daou (@peterdaou) September 6, 2018
This is DANGEROUS and WRONG.
ANONYMOUShttps://t.co/wqRnYJN2V8 pic.twitter.com/ZJEGcdhSpW
— Bill Day (@BillDaytoons) September 9, 2018
On PBS NewsHour Jeff Greenfield @greenfield64 commented that Trump calling for an investigation of the "anonymous source" reminded him of an old Soviet joke:
— MM PETE 2020 / CHASTEN FIRST GENT WH (@MMTakeAction) September 9, 2018
"A man was arrested for calling Khrushchev an 'idiot.' He was charged with revealing State secrets." pic.twitter.com/dGJlaF71MO
If the allegations made by the Anonymous op-ed are not truth, why does Trump want to investigate who the leaker is? If it isn't true all he has to do is deny it. He is acting like confidential presidential activities are being leaked. This just validates the op-ed's veracity.
— clyde tucker (@clydetucker328) September 9, 2018
The anonymous op-ed is nothing novel to those who know about China’s modern history — Inner party struggle has always been the theme.
— Krystal Hu (@readkrystalhu) September 6, 2018
(pic via WeChat) pic.twitter.com/byHtDk8h8M